Supreme Court Refuses to Suspend CEC Gyanesh Kumar over Alleged Unilateral Decisions in ECI
- The Supreme Court refused to suspend Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar while seeking the Election Commission of India’s response to allegations of unilateral decisions.
- The court said media reports alone were insufficient and requested certified information on whether the disputed decisions were unanimous or made by majority.
- The Election Commission said objections raised during decision-making were part of normal administrative work and that decisions on the Special Intensive Revision schedule were unanimous.
- The court said it could later annul or reconsider decisions found to violate the law, while Rahul Gandhi accused Kumar of illegally changing Form 6.
70 Articles
70 Articles
SC’s big order on SIR: Refuses to suspend CEC Gyanesh Kumar, issues notice on plea challenging ECI decisions
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday declined to pass any interim order restraining Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar from functioning over allegations that he took several decisions unilaterally despite objections from the other two Election Commissioners. The controversy surrounding the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has once again brought into focus a crucial distinction that critics of the Election Commis…
Established beyond doubt Gyanesh Kumar changed Form 6 illegally, unilaterally: Rahul
New Delhi, Oct 5 (PTI) Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Monday said it is now established beyond doubt that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar changed Form 6 “illegally and unilaterally”, and asserted that the CEC as well as everyone else involved in this “criminal assault on democracy” will be held accountable. The Leader of Opposition […]
SC says changes to Form 6 not made by court; says post-retirement immunity to CEC not available to even judges
SC hears petitions demanding suspension of CEC Gyanesh Kumar over allegations of bias, administrative unilateralism, and procedural overreach during the SIR process
'Modified Form 6 Not Approved By Supreme Court': Chief Justice Surya Kant
The ECI has said that Form 6 itself has not been amended; it maintained that it only added an extra declaration to be used by new voters for the voter roll cleanup exercise Special Intensive Revision (SIR)
SC seeks EC response on changes during SIR: Why has Form 6 become a flashpoint
A bench comprising Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justices Bagchi and Mohana sought responses from the Election Commission, the Centre, the CEC and the other two election commissioners before examining whether the poll panel's statutory procedure was followed. The bench refused to pass an immediate order seeking the suspension of CEC , while considering the controversy over Form 6, which was one of the central issues raised in the petitions.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 61% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
