Wells Fargo was set to pay a whistleblower $180 million — then cut it to $55 million, even though nothing about the case itself had changed. That is what makes this difficult to ignore, because it suggests the outcome was not driven by the facts, but by something inside the system that changed instead. At first glance, that does not add up. If a whistleblower helps expose billions in wrongdoing, the reward should follow the scale of the result, …
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.