US Supreme Court lets Voting Rights Act ruling take effect ahead of schedule
The order lets Louisiana move ahead without the usual 32-day delay, speeding efforts to redraw a map that could erase two majority-Black districts.
- On Monday, the Supreme Court allowed its recent Voting Rights Act of 1965 ruling to take effect immediately, bypassing the standard 32-day waiting period for Louisiana to redraw congressional maps.
- The Court's April 29 6-3 decision struck down Louisiana's map as an "unconstitutional gerrymander", with Justice Samuel Alito writing that Voting Rights Act vote dilution protections do not apply when maps lack sufficient majority-minority districts.
- Bypassing the month-long pause prompted a sharp exchange between Alito and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, who decried the decision as "tantamount to an approval of Louisiana's rush to pause the ongoing election."
- Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry suspended the state's U.S. House primaries to facilitate redistricting, a move that could eliminate one of two majority-Black Democratic seats before November.
- Republican-Led states including Tennessee, Georgia, South Carolina, and Alabama are assessing whether to leverage this ruling to boost GOP gerrymandering efforts, signaling broader potential shifts in congressional control.
114 Articles
114 Articles
Judicial backlash against the Second Reconstruction Era of the 1960’s
The U.S. Supreme Court on Oct. 29, 2024. (Photo by Jane Norman/States Newsroom)The U. S. Supreme Court just issued its decision in Louisiana v. Callais. By a 6-3 vote, the conservative majority of the court effectively gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by allowing states to dilute the voting power of minority voters. Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion. While characterizing the decision as consistent with his view of the 15t…
DANIEL VAUGHAN: The Liberal Justices Slow-Walked the Court. They Got Caught.
The Supreme Court does not usually move fast. On Monday night, it did. The Justices issued an immediate order finalizing their April 29 ruling on Louisiana’s congressional map, weeks ahead of the standard timeline. After a Supreme Court decision, the formal order normally takes 32 more days to issue. That window lets the losing side...
Supreme Court 'boiling over' into malfunction as conservatives choose 'sides'
There has been a “deterioration of morale” at the U.S. Supreme Court, Yale Law School professor Justin Driver told Bloomberg News, as he predicted “there will be major fireworks” by the time the high court’s term comes to a close around the end of June.Other legal scholars share that concern.“It appears from the outside that there has been an erosion of comity and trust,” William & Mary Law School constitutional and administrative law Professor …
WNTZ FOX 48
KLFYPlaintiffs say Supreme Court moved too quickly in Louisiana map ruling
A group of plaintiffs is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its recent decision in a Louisiana redistricting case, arguing the court moved too quickly and that they should be given more time to formally seek a rehearing.
The many problems with and caused by Monday's Supreme Court voting-case order
It was, as Justice Elena Kagan explained less than a week ago, a project of the U.S. Supreme Court’s conservative majority for more than a decade to destroy the Voting Rights Act. But, once it was done, the Republican appointees and their fellow travelers in Louisiana moved immediately to implement their ruling. The Supreme Court on Monday — just five days after the court’s Callais decision — issued an order putting the ruling into effect immedi…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 45% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
