Published • loading... • Updated
Tories to use ancient mechanism to force release of Mandelson vetting papers after criminal investigation launched
Conservatives seek full disclosure of vetting documents on Mandelson's US ambassador appointment amid police probe into his links with Jeffrey Epstein.
- The Opposition plans to table a humble address to force release of papers related to Mandelson after police launched an investigation into his links to Epstein and his resignation from the Lords on Tuesday.
- Mandelson's political background explains the sensitivity: he was business secretary in Gordon Brown's government, made a life peer, and last year appointed UK ambassador to the US but sacked after emails showed support for Epstein.
- The motion targets specific files including Cabinet Office due diligence, emails with Morgan McSweeney, and meeting minutes, while humble addresses bind ministers to produce those documents if passed.
- Several Labour MPs signalled they would back the motion, and Mandelson stepped down from the House of Lords on Tuesday, increasing cross-party pressure on ministers.
- No 10 sought to limit disclosure by adding an amendment excluding papers prejudicial to UK national security or international relations, while Kemi Badenoch demanded answers on vetting concerns being waived away.
Insights by Ground AI
7 Articles
7 Articles
Tories to use ancient mechanism to force release of Mandelson vetting papers after criminal investigation launched
So-called humble addresses are binding on ministers if passed, with several Labour MPs telling Sky News they would be prepared to vote with the Opposition.
·United Kingdom
Read Full ArticleTories seek to force UK Government to release Mandelson appointment papers
The Conservatives will seek to force the UK Government to release all information relating to Sir Keir Starmer’s appointment of Lord Mandelson as ambassador to the United States after explosive new revelations about his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch demanded Downing Street explain the vetting process as she claimed concerns were “waived […]
·Wales, United Kingdom
Read Full ArticleCoverage Details
Total News Sources7
Leaning Left2Leaning Right1Center2Last UpdatedBias Distribution40% Left, 40% Center
Bias Distribution
- 40% of the sources lean Left, 40% of the sources are Center
40% Center
L 40%
C 40%
R 20%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium






