The TC Contradicts the Supreme Court's Thesis on "Personal Benefit" for Not Amnestying the Embezzlement of the Process
10 Articles
10 Articles
Constitutional Judge José María Macías fulfils his commitment so that the first two independence leaders who were still awaiting amnesty can be protected at the next plenary session.
The new draft sentence that Judge José María Macías will take to the Constitutional Plenary on October 6, this time considering Turull's application for amparo, argues that the Supreme Court did not act illogically or arbitrarily by not applying amnesty to the crime of embezzlement of the leaders of the 'procese', but instead incurred a 'lack of motivation' (not an error) in his reasoning.
Macías drafts a new draft with the arguments of the progressive majority against the refusal of the high court to amnesty embezzlement
The new draft of the report considers that the court "departed from the purpose of the rule" approved by Congress
The draft sentence indicates that the law seeks to forgive the misappropriations of the 'procedure' "with the sole exception of acts of corruption."More information: The majority of pro-government CT sees amnesty applicable to embezzlement and opens the door to Puigdemont
A surprising turn of events for the rapporteur of the ruling on Jordi Turull's appeal for protection that must be deliberated and approved in the plenary session of the Constitutional Court (TC), next October 6. The magistrates have already received the second draft signed by José Maria Macías, from the hardest wing of the conservative sector and Catalan magistrate, which … Continued
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 60% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
