Skip to main content
See every side of every news story
Published loading...Updated

Scientists challenge US NIH grant screening as unconstitutional

The class-action suit says NIH used 235 keywords to block or renegotiate grants after peer review, affecting more than 5,700 awards, according to reports.

  • On Wednesday, 17 researchers filed a class-action lawsuit against the National Institutes of Health, alleging the agency unconstitutionally censors grants by screening for keywords the Trump administration disfavors.
  • The agency employs a list of 235 prohibited keywords, including 'gender' and 'climate change,' to flag research applications conflicting with administration priorities, the complaint states.
  • Stanford University surgeon Arghavan Salles said, 'Scientists should not have to scrub their research to receive federal funding.' Researchers refusing to modify grant language risk losing funding.
  • NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya has denied using banned word lists, yet court filings show the agency used keywords to identify and terminate grants the Department of Health and Human Services no longer wished to subsidize.
  • If the court rules for the plaintiffs, the decision applies to any researcher affected by keyword searches, potentially impacting thousands beyond the 17 named scientists in the class-action suit.
Insights by Ground AI

8 Articles

Think freely.Subscribe and get full access to Ground NewsSubscriptions start at $9.99/yearSubscribe

Bias Distribution

  • 100% of the sources are Center
100% Center

Factuality Info Icon

To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

Ownership

Info Icon

To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage

lawcommentary.com broke the news on Wednesday, September 16, 2026.
Too Big Arrow Icon
Sources are mostly out of (0)

Similar News Topics

News
Feed Dots Icon
For You
Search Icon
Search
Blindspot LogoBlindspotLocal