Court to Hear Arguments on Whether to Further Cut Back Campaign Finance Limitations
Republican plaintiffs argue spending caps violate the First Amendment by limiting coordination with candidates, risking up to $3.9 million in Senate campaign coordinated expenditures.
5 Articles
5 Articles
Court to hear arguments on whether to further cut back campaign finance limitations
Nearly a quarter-century ago, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge in Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Federal Republican Campaign Committee to the constitutionality of limits on the amount of money that political parties can spend in coordination with a candidate for office. On Tuesday, Dec. 9, the justices will hear oral arguments in a case, National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, asking them to strike…
US Supreme Court to consider removing limits on election spending
Caps on election spending may become a thing of the past. The U.S. Supreme Court is considering a Republican-led drive, backed by President Donald Trump’s administration to overturn a quarter-century-old decision and erase limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and president. In 2001, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a provision of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) limiting how much politi…
Republicans challenge key campaign finance restrictions at Supreme Court
Republicans are gearing up for a Supreme Court showdown that could blow the lid off one of the last barriers to big money in politics. The crux of the matter is a case called National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. FEC, set to be argued on Dec. 9, 2025, where the GOP is pushing to dismantle limits on coordinated spending between party organizations and individual candidates, as Yahoo News reports. Campaign finance has long been a batt…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Left
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

