Published 2 days ago • loading... • Updated 18 hours ago
Nikole Hannah-Jones' experiment accidentally undercuts her case against school choice
Hannah-Jones says the choice aimed to confront segregation, but her daughter later questioned whether it limited her education.
In a recent essay for The New York Times Magazine, Nikole Hannah-Jones reconsiders her decade-old decision to enroll her daughter, Najya, in a predominantly Black, low-income Brooklyn public school.
Hannah-Jones, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, initially championed the enrollment as a stand against educational segregation, defending the choice despite recognizing systemic issues within the school system.
As Najya grew older, she confronted her mother about the school's lack of rigor, including grading curves that obscured fundamental skill gaps. "I know I got an A, or at least a B," Najya said, despite lacking foundational skills.
The essay sparked debate, with some readers sympathizing with the dilemma while others criticized the premise as a false dichotomy for parents with resources. Hannah-Jones acknowledged the decision "became an unbearable pattern."
"Her top schools were heavily white and screened their students," Hannah-Jones wrote, defending her stance against school choice systems she believes perpetuate segregation. Her position remains that systemic change matters more than individual advantage.