While DNA ruled out any genetic link between the two, Justice remarked that recognition is “irrevocable,” unless there is a vice of will. Read more
This story is only covered by news sources that have yet to be evaluated by the independent media monitoring agencies we use to assess the quality and reliability of news outlets on our platform. Learn more here.
One man applied to the provincial court for the annulment of the recognition of a son which he himself concluded in 1996. In his presentation, the plaintiff argued that this young man is not his biological son and that that recognition was based on an “essential error” about his fatherhood. Although the genetic examination confirmed that the plaintiff was not the biological father of the defendant, the court pointed out that the recognition of f…