Lindsay Clancy Juror Says Panel Viewed Case as a Chance to “Make It Better for Other Women”
- The jury in the Lindsay Clancy case consisted of nine women and three men, resulting in an 11-1 deadlock and a mistrial after one holdout juror refused to acquit her by reason of insanity.
- Juror Paula Devlin revealed that the mostly female jury saw the case as an opportunity to improve conditions for women and families and to prevent future tragedies.
16 Articles
16 Articles
Lindsay Clancy jurors reveal they were hellbent on social justice, not the law
A cadre of social justice jurors accused the lone male holdout of ignoring the judge’s instructions while all along it was they who had ignored the law. ‘It was juror insurrection!’ attorney Mark Pulliam declared.
Lindsay Clancy Juror Admits Using Vote to Push Social Justice for Women
A juror who voted to spare Lindsay Clancy from a murder conviction said she saw the trial as a “turning point” that could “make it better for other women,” remarks that critics say recast the killing of three children as a cause. Paula Devlin made the comments in a CBS Saturday Morning interview clip. Devlin […]
Lindsay Clancy Juror Says Panel Saw Case as a Chance to “Make It Better for Other Women”
Internewscast Internewscast One of the 11 jurors who favored finding Massachusetts mother Lindsay Clancy… This Post: Lindsay Clancy Juror Says Panel Saw Case as a Chance to “Make It Better for Other Women” first appeared on Internewscast
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 86% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium















