Alito says Supreme Court can’t stem emergency appeals and voices concern over Trump’s rhetoric
Alito says the court now handles emergency petitions at a pace that rivals its merits docket, with 41 Trump administration requests last week alone.
- On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito released a book noting that emergency appeals have skyrocketed during President Donald Trump's second administration, now rivaling cases the Supreme Court considers with full briefing and oral arguments.
- Presidents increasingly enact policies through executive orders rather than Congress, fueling lawsuits and robust lower-court rulings that force rapid Supreme Court intervention, Alito explained.
- Alito rejected claims his rulings align with the "Make America Great Again" camp, stating "I honestly try to decide every single case on the merits, every single application on the merit."
- Trump has praised Alito as "one of the Greatest of All Time" while simultaneously maligning other justices he appointed as "unpatriotic," reflecting broader political pressure on the Court.
- The Court remains at the center of debated issues including the president's ballroom construction and mail ballot restrictions, with Alito warning the surge in emergency decisions is "going to continue.
53 Articles
53 Articles
Alito casts doubt on judicial remedy to emergency docket flood
"I'm afraid this is going to continue," the Supreme Court justice said in a recent interview.
Justice Alito Says Supreme Court Emergency Cases Have Gone Through the Roof — And Washington Built the Crisis – 100PercentFedUp.com – by Isaac
Justice Samuel Alito says Supreme Court emergency cases have exploded. His diagnosis points beyond one president to a constitutional system under strain.
Alito says Supreme Court can’t stem rise of emergency appeals, 'not pleased' with Trump's rhetoric
The justice told The Associated Press in a rare interview that the rhetoric about the court from Trump and his administration doesn't sit well with him.
Judge Alito criticizes the increase in emergency appeals in the Supreme Court, driven by executive policies and divisive rhetoric. He defends his impartiality in judicial decisions, rejecting links with specific political agendas and underlining his focus on the merits of each case.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 42% of the sources are Center
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium

































