Delhi Riots: Court Acquits 12, Says Mere Mob Membership Cannot Prove Guilt
7 Articles
7 Articles
North East Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi Court Acquits 12 Accused of Rioting, Murder, Saying Prosecution Failed to Prove Allegations
Get latest articles and stories on India at LatestLY. Delhi's Karkardooma Court has acquitted 12 accused of unlawful assembly, rioting, arson, murder and destruction of evidence, Dacoity, provoking public sentiments, etc., saying that the Prosecution has failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. India News | North East Delhi Riots 2020: Delhi Court Acquits 12 Accused of Rioting, Murder, Saying Prosecution Failed to Prove Allegatio…
Delhi riots: Court acquits 12, says mere mob membership cannot prove guilt
A court in New Delhi has acquitted 12 persons accused of murder, rioting, and dacoity in a 2020 northeast Delhi riots case, saying that criminal liability cannot be fastened on a person merely because he was a member of an unlawful assembly without proof of his individual acts.
In the Mursaleen murder case related to the Delhi riots, the Karkardooma Court acquitted Lokesh Solanki and Pankaj Sharma, among 12 accused, of charges including murder, rioting, arson, robbery, and hate speech. The court said the prosecution could not prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt.
Court says guilt cannot be proven just because one is a member of a crowd
Said- Proof of personal guilt against the accused is necessary (Aaj Samaj), New Delhi: In a case related to the 2020 Delhi riots, the court acquitted 12 people facing various charges including murder, rioting, and robbery. The court said that criminal responsibility cannot be fixed against a person merely because […] The post Delhi Riots Case: Court acquits 12 accused in Delhi riots case, says merely being part of a mob does not prove guilt appe…
2020 Delhi riots: Court acquits 12, says mere mob membership cannot prove guilt
A court here has acquitted 12 persons accused of murder, rioting, and dacoity in a 2020 northeast Delhi riots case, saying that criminal liability cannot be fastened on a person merely because he was a member of an unlawful assembly without proof of his individual acts.
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 100% of the sources lean Right
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
